Campaigning boss takes reasoned view of government’s anti-motoring agenda

Admitting to being surprised at his comments, Iain Robertson agrees with Mark Sait, CEO of SaveMoneyCutCarbon.com, who feels that honourable intentions should always be balanced against the implications for the general public.

Although some critics might suggest that most of the current government’s intentions are little more than flimflam, in its pursuit of an exit from the EU, it has been making several promises and potential commitments for the future. Among them is a major investment in public transport systems nationwide, as a means to reduce congestion and, therefore, pollution in built-up areas.

A recent report by the Science and Technology Select Committee, echoed by sitting MPs, claimed that the best way for UK citizens to fight climate change was to stop driving their cars. However, proposing that UK motorists should leave their cars behind altogether raises major concerns about the state of British public transport.  

Yet, that is not all, as many drivers feel that they cannot rely on buses and trains, and for some, cutting out a car is likely be too major a lifestyle change. It is also likely to be inconvenient to those people who commute and travel regularly, let alone those living in outlying areas.



Mark Sait, of SaveMoneyCutCarbon, believes that, while the recent report may be honourable in its intentions, it is taking neither the most realistic, nor most practical approach. As he explains: “Many people are not going to feel comfortable trading in their cars for trains and buses. Sadly, it is another example of the UK government suggesting that ordinary people make huge, inconvenient life changes.”



SaveMoneyCutCarbon consults with prominent businesses on carbon footprint control and continues to advise public bodies and households alike. Its ethos is to present ways for people to be kinder to the environment, without forcing them to make major concessions that only raise resistance, which Mr Sait believes to be the key to people adopting positive changes. 



He continues: “Instead of telling people what they need to cut back on, or sacrifice, we should be looking at more positive options. Money-saving changes at home, such as switching to energy efficient LED bulbs, or installing solar panels, benefit both the owner and the environment. People will be more receptive to ideas that help rather than hinder them. It’s all about sustainability, without compromise.”



While removing cars from the road seems like a good idea in principle, public transport is not at a point where it is either reliable, or cost-effective. More realistic channels are needed to meet UK targets. Mr Sait’s company has already helped UK businesses and public bodies to shave money from their energy bills, while reducing their carbon footprints.  

As he concludes: “It is possible to make positive impacts on the environment, without sacrificing comfort and disrupting routines. Our government needs to understand that people will be more receptive to positive change, rather than making grand, sweeping compromises. It is a case of keeping things convenient and finding mutual benefits.

MSG Summary

While HM Government may be excused in light of present circumstances for not being more circumspect, removing cars from our roads would cause mayhem.

Join the Priority Club

Whether it’s your weekly grocery shop, reducing your utility bills or looking for a weekend take-away delivered to your door, Priority Club has a deal to save you money!